“About the current moment” №2(134), April 2018. Globalization as a «hybrid war» and the mission of Russia in it
- Let’s remember Lord Palmerston
- The incident with the Skripals and its meaning
- Why Russia is «the Empire of Evil» for the West
To the 70th Anniversary of the Great Victory (1945): Get Rid of Illusions Power!
Ides of March in 2015 discovered entirely new period in the history of information wars: it will be characterized by West total lie. Lie (by European Union and its masters) of such scale, that lie by Joseph Goebbels’ office of Third Reich will look as innocent child tales in comparison to it. This process of West unprecedented lie stuffing will be aggravated by wide distribution of the Internet through society and the absence of knowledge methodology (i.e. distinguishing truth and lie) in educational systems of both West and East cultures. Information excess (either false or true) in the absence of methodology of mining from this flow information indeed necessary for the society for solving its problems, in the presence of the Internet — is equivalent to full absence of information. This circumstance for the first time raises question “life-death” to mankind. Because there is no white lie, and even the truth, when becoming reckless belief, misleads and conducts to death “zombies” enslaved by it.
It’s dangerous to live being captured by illusions. This concerns as conceptions about historic past, and also conceptions about nowadays, on basis of which political course for future has been working out. II World War of 20th century and its component – the Great Patriotic War – take particular place in this problematics, and also — their global political after-effects, which still put pressure on future formation for Europe, Russia and whole mankind. Though these themes in detail can be covered only with “stout books”, but the essence of the question can be represented in several brief statements:
This note complements contents of the work of IP USSR (Internal Predictor of USSR) 1998-1999 «Sad heritage of Atlantis. Trotskyism is “yesterday”, but in no way – “tomorrow”», which is suggested for reading before the current note.
The essence briefly
“De-Stalinization”: dead souls at work…
Those are the intentions for the future of the bourgeois-liberal public and statesmen. However, before turning to the consideration of the prospects of “de-Stalinization”, which became the main ideological problem of state power in the post-Soviet Rusziony, refer to history and literature to understand the spirit of the policy: the imperial before 1917, Stalin’s, rusziony’s of our days.
In Russian history there are two literary characters and one historical figure, whose sociological views, being powerful over one or another segments of the collective unconscious, had largely determined the events of the past and the prospects of Russia in XXI century. These are the Grand Inquisitor of F.M. Dostoyevsky, the Great Combinator of Ilya Ilf and Yevgeny Petrov and the Pskov’s Spaso-Eleazar monastery’s monk Filofey (also spelled as Philotheos; years of life approximately: 1465-1542), the first ideologist of the doctrine “Moscow — the Third Rome”.
One of the main cultural problem of the global scale for the Biblical project wheeler-dealers is the Koranic Islam.
The very reason of this problem is explained by the fact that the global and political doctrine, the basis for the Western policy, is based on two statements:
In spite of the fact that these statements are not directly mentioned, they are being strictly implemented.
Koran denies the Judaism predominance doctrine over the rest people and the usury is under a strict ban and is characterized as a kind of Satanism. These statements are not practically used in the political life of Muslims, based on the alternative concept different to the Biblical slavery concept , the Western wheeler-dealers understand that Koran – is the potential threat to their global power regime imposition. This explains their desire to leave Koran in its historical legacy.
One of the ways to resolve “the problem of Islam” for the Western wheeler-dealers – is multiway policy:
The fact, that nowadays human society and computer networks are both informational sys-tems, allows us to draw analogies between them. As operating system is the core element of any computer network, culture with its norms and values, in the same way, is a key element of any soci-ety. Just as operating system is comprehensive to applications, the culture is comprehensive to eco-nomics of a society. In other words people build their trade networks and maintain their relationships according to cultural norms and moral values deriving from culture. So in order to get to the root of current global malfunction we need to understand the dominating culture, in other words our culture on bible platform.
Architecture of bible-based culture contains several components. The base is encrypted and cannot be accessed by the majority of users/general public. However, to allow resolution of various routine tasks there is an “admin” group with more rights that has access to a console, whose log is translated in a document also known as “Old testament”. In order to provide small group of develop-ers with outstanding rights over any common user, the platform provides them with special functional options, which are not documented for informational security reasons. From common user’s point of view developers’ functions/abilities are often perceived as “MIRACLE”. Common user has access only to attractive but functionally limited program shell, which is accessible anywhere in the world, doesn’t require specific user skills or knowledge, has friendly interface and allows solving basic tasks. Common users know it as “New testament”. To increase number of users and enhance world-wide coverage this program was adapted to national specifics and rebranded as “Orthodox”, “Ca-tholicism”, “Protestantism”, “Socialism” etc. Rights of commercial distribution and management of these brands were transferred to a few closed organizations formed and functioning by same princi-ples as closed corporations. From time to time common users are shown elections of board members and board heads of those corporations.
At the end of January – beginning of February 2008 “Russia” TV-channel has two times shown the film “The Fall of the Empire. The Byzantium Lesson”, filmed by “the pastor” archimandrite Tikhon (Shevkunov, who has been raised to the rank of V. V. Putin’s “personal confessor” by mass-media), and who has got a cinematographic education. According to the concept of Byzantium history stated in the film, in the history of Russian Empire – USSR – post-Soviet RusZionia those cultural and political mistakes, which by Tikhon’s opinion have brought Byzantium to ruin, have been repeated in many aspects. The main mistake (in his representation) is the of Empire people’s apostasy of the so-called “orthodox faith” that caused numerous mistakes – consequences of that “principal mistake”.
In press (which in present RusZionia, as in 1980-90th, is still overwhelmed by the spirit of liberalism so the West is “all light in window” for them) all the discussion on film was reduced to the following. Reproaching Tikhon of tendentious interpretation of the history of the Byzantium society and its mutual relations with the outer world; indicating several actual mistakes and discrepancies; charging that the film groundlessly tries to convince RusZionian people that the West is the pathological enemy of Russia during all the history.
Actually the film has the indisputable advantage which hasn’t been noticed by liberal critics. It states the question: What defects does the so-called “Orthodoxy” have? The defects, since which the Byzantium society, based on the “Orthodox” worldview and world-understanding , wasn’t able to solve actual social and state problems in proper times and tried to find ready receipts at the West during thousand-year history of “East Rome empire”? In fact the, the same repeats as well in the history of Russia, which had accepted the “main treasure” of Byzantium – the so-called “Orthodox faith” (as it is stated in the film).
Without answering this question or without accusing its inconsistency perspectives of Russia’s revival as the society self-sufficient in the aspect of meaning of life – are vague. I.e. “the Time of Troubles ” as a crash of the historically formed culture may repeat.